On 11/16/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Cory Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-16 14:40]:
> I respectfully suggest that those who criticize his work should
> use their energies to /improve/ his test rather than merely
> dismissing it as worthless. Using his code as a base, couldn't
> one create a test that was more fair? Then someone would have
> a test that shows results that are more 'real' and give
> potential users more information with which to make a decision.
Sorry, come again?
If I say "I'm afraid this pasta tastes so awful I just can't eat
it", would you respond "well at least [the cook] did prepare
something! maybe you should stop mouthing off and do it better"?
That depends. Am I part of collection of individuals who's goal is to
collaboratively create better pasta or am I someone who paid money for
someone to prepare me pasta?
I think the answer to that question points out why I bothered to
originally respond to this message. I tire of being repeatedly
berated for thinking it would be cool for someone to create a
benchmark based on the criticisms of those of you that can lend
advice. Since I'm not putting my money where my mouth is, I'll take
my ball and go home. ;)
--
Cory 'G' Watson
http://www.onemogin.com
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
