Brandon Black wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Sebastian Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And p5 development is not as active as you might think,
>> just take a look at the comments under
>> http://use.perl.org/~sri/journal/31519.
>>
>> The quote "Perl5 is not dead, it's just very, very stable" sums it up
>> quite well.
>>
>
> 216 distinct threads in the past 3 weeks on the p5p mailing list
> (according to gmail) say otherwise. P5 development is definitely
> "active". The upload activity on CPAN is on a constant upwards trend.
> The mere existence of groundbreaking modules like Moose are hard
> evidence as well.
In fact, P5P has more traffic than all the Perl6 lists combined. My
perl6 folder has 163 unread messages, and p5p has 754. (Yes, I'm a bit
behind.)
Perl. Is. Not. Dead.
Is there anything more we need to add to this discussion?
--
package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)->config(name => do {
$,.=reverse qw[Jonathan tsu rehton lre rekca Rockway][$_].[split //,
";$;"]->[$_].q; ;for 1..4;$,=~s;^.;;;$,});$;->setup;
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
