Don't we have to do both of these?
Coverage of the 'make test' will only show coverage for those modules we
can test 'statically' i.e. by making direct calls to the methods in the
tests
Tests that are done with LWP (or is it Mechanize) which are http
requests to the application will probably be the bulk of the tests for a
big application and these will not be caught by the first method but
will by the second.
I suppose I am asking if both these can be combined to give total
coverage from the two techniques.
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
Ian Docherty wrote:
Is it possible to do coverage tests in a Catalyst application? If so
how? I can't find any references that help.
Catalyst apps aren't special -- do coverage tests like you would with
any other perl module:
$ cover -delete
$ HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES=-MDevel::Cover make test
$ cover
If you want "coverage" and not test coverage (why?), then just do
$ perl -MDevel::Cover myapp_server.pl
<request stuff>
$ cover
Regards,
Jonathan Rockway
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
