On 6 Dec 2006, at 13:57, Simon Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Matt S Trout wrote:
I wouldn't use HTML::Widget at all. The people who took over maint
after sebastian gave up on it have struggled valiantly to make it
useful and production quality and so far as I'm concerned failed. Not
one of his better experiments :)
So what's considered best practice in this area, is it still
Data::FormValidator or should we be looking at something else ?
I hate that, the ::Simple variety and CGI::FormBuilder least out of
the current CPAN-able options.
Personally, I'm using Reaction for this but our "newer, shinier,
rounder" variant on this oft-reinvented wheel is still a bit
documentation-shy so I'm not sure I'd recommend it to anybody with a
SAN score in the double digits just yet.
--
Matt S Trout, Technical Director, Shadowcat Systems Ltd.
Offering custom development, consultancy and support contracts for
Catalyst,
DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for
details.
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-
class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
