On 14 Dec 2006, at 19:26, vb wrote:
I think you can see also,
DBIx::OO::Tree
Except that as we discussed in private mail, your reasons for writing
DBIx::OO were primarily to learn more perl and you were unaware of
the existence of DBIx::Class.
Please rather than re-inventing any more wheels we've already gone to
a lot of trouble to implement, could you talk to me about how we
could collaborate and how the DBIC architecture could support your
further work - the perl world really doesn't need yet another ORM and
DBIx::Class was implemented in a highly componentised fashion and
maintains very open development policies specifically to make it
easier for people to collaborate as a community rather than
duplicating each other's work.
Your code seems to be pretty good; we'd much rather have you working
with us than re-inventing things we've already done - everybody would
get more good code to use that way, which is after all rather the
point of open source :)
--
Matt S Trout, Technical Director, Shadowcat Systems Ltd.
Offering custom development, consultancy and support contracts for
Catalyst,
DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for
details.
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-
class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
