On 2 Jan 2007, at 18:52, Daniel McBrearty wrote:

"The only thing to remember is that it expects the I18N plugin to be
loaded since all text is run through that before display"

Hmmm. I specifically don't want to use that plugin, as we have our own
version which is similar but different. We may be a bit wrongheaded
about this at the moment, but I've not yet found any practical reason
to change it ...

I don't need any transation of text for the crud stuff anyhow - it's
all purely admin functions, which are English only.

But I guess all it really wants is to see methods with the appropriate
names in the $c namespace ... so no problem.

Yep, absolutely. But it was kinda critical to our use to enable L10N from the ground up so we used the standard approach.

I explicitly -don't- check to see if the plugin's loaded though and never will - I might need to implement something completely different myself one day too :)

--
Matt S Trout, Technical Director, Shadowcat Systems Ltd.
Offering custom development, consultancy and support contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for details. + Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix- class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +



_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to