I looked for that discussion - didn't find it. Do you have a pointer?
In your experience, what is accounting for the other 99.9% fo runtime? Db access? templates? other? On 1/16/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14 Jan 2007, at 15:26, Octavian Rasnita wrote: > Hi, > > Here is ablog I just found. Is it true that Catalyst is so slow > comparing with other frameworks? > http://letsgetdugg.com/category/rails Is it true that for incredibly trivial applications Catalyst might serve less rps? Yes. Have I ever seen a real-world scenario where the things this benchmarks account for more than 0.1% of runtime? No. We discussed this. Re-read the old discussion. Thread over :) -- Matt S Trout, Technical Director, Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Offering custom development, consultancy and support contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for details. + Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix- class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ + _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
-- Daniel McBrearty email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer BTW : 0873928131 _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
