On Feb 23, 2007, at 6:36 PM, John Napiorkowski wrote:
How do we want to go about fixing this? Should we make sure that 302 follows the spec as outlined above (sets a body with the redirect link if one doesn't already exist), create a test patch etc?
Yeah it was a bug, although the spec does use the word SHOULD so it should still work even though we didn't follow it.
I've fixed it already, but I still need to add a test for it. http:// dev.catalyst.perl.org/changeset/6109
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
