On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:00:20PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Adam Bartosik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-22 13:05]: > > Because of flexibility, Catalyst could be very difficult at > > start (many chooses) > > I hear that a lot. I don???t get it, though. The tutorial tells you > to use TT and DBIC. If you install the Catalyst glue for them, > you get helper support for both. It doesn???t seem to me like you > have to make any choices, unless you feel a need to question the > community.
In our case, the choice of form validators is what really took time. I started with Catalyst::Plugin::FormValidator, as suggested in the tutorial, but found it inadequate. Then we tried Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder. Now we're using Form::Processor. I guess we're not the only ones who've been in this quandary, based on 1) the long recent thread on form validators and 2) the active development of alternatives like HTML::FormFu. -- Quinn Weaver, independent contractor | President, San Francisco Perl Mongers http://fairpath.com/quinn/resume/ | http://sf.pm.org/ _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
