Il giorno gio, 07/06/2007 alle 15.00 +0100, Matt S Trout ha scritto: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:43:59AM +0200, Leo Cacciari wrote: > > Sorry for the post to the list.... I truly hate Reply-To header.... My > > mail reader has a 'reply to all' butto just for replying to mailing > > lists... Well, I'll be more attentive in the future... > > And mine (mutt) lets you hit 'r', 'n', enter to reply to the original poster > even with reply-to munging on. > > reply-to munging in -principle- is a bad thing but in practice it results > in less misrouted mail on a list like this where the vast majority case is > wanting to make an on-list reply - I was opposed to turning it on originally > but there was a clear majority in favour (I'm your friendly neighbourhood > listadmin if you weren't aware :) and in practice it does seem to have turned > out to be the better option for this list. >
Yes, I know the rationale behind the decision to use Reply-To, I even agree with it, but I still thinks that having it on a mailing list is a PITA :). Maybe mail readers should have a configuration option to ignore Reply-To at leas when it's equal to List-Post... -- Leo "TheHobbit" Cacciari
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
