So is this not a good option if I want specific logic in Model::Foo but not
Model::Bar ( I can't even create these without breaking )
This seems to run contrary to my reading of the documentation and tutorials,
etc.
On 6/7/07, Matt S Trout < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:40:00PM -0500, Guy Debord wrote:
> Matt et al,
>
> All of my models -- such as TMP::Model::Foo -- created by the helper
> -- use DBIC::Schema as a base class and are configured to use
> TMP::Schema as their schema_class.
Yes. You only need *one* model per DBIC::Schema!
> tmp_create.pl model Bar DBIC::Schema TMP::Schema create=static
connect_info
tmp_create.pl model DB DBIC::Schema TMP::Schema
$c->model('DB::Foo')
$c->model('DB::Bar')
etc.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class
project?
Technical Director Want a managed development or deployment
platform?
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a
quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcatsystems.co
.uk/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org /mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@
lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
