On 6/9/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would change it to:
>
> setup_components:
> ModelName:
> type: model
> class: Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema
> instantiate:
> schema_class: My::Schema
> connect_info: ....
>
> to get rid of the Model => model mapping.
But then you'd need special case syntax to declare two types of cntroller
of the same name somewhere. Ick.
OK - I don't like having semantics in the names, but there are
exceptions (for example the mapping of controller names to urls). So
I don't care too much about that point.
How is the test case? Did I miss something in it? (beside a test for
the COMPONENT call which, as I understand should be quite similar to
the one for the 'new' call).
--
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
