On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:28:36AM +0000, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > When we are at this View refactoring. When changing the template you > need to put the whole path on stash ( $c->stash( template = > template_path/template.tt) ). What I would propose is that the view > automatically used the $c->action->namespace as the template_path - so > that you would not need to specify the full path - only the template > name.
Do you mean instead of $c->action->reverse like C::V::TT does now? That is, so you always have to specify the template name? This is what I currently do in my TT view: sub template_name { my ( $self, $c ) = @_; return $c->stash->{template} if $c->stash->{template}; my $extension = $self->config->{TEMPLATE_EXTENSION} || '.tt'; my $template_suffix = delete $c->stash->{template_suffix} || q''; my $name = $c->stash->{template_action} ? $c->action->namespace . '/' . $c->stash->{template_action} : $c->action->reverse; return $name . $template_suffix . $extension; } So, in my case, is setting the template_action stash what you are describing? I'm wondering how generic setting the template name can be. Do different templating tools use similar template names, or is this mostly for TT? I almost always tweak the template paths, too. Sometimes it's for skinning/branding or it's for I18N (e.g. root/templates/<language tag>/). -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/