* Robert Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-28 15:00]: > Memcached is not distributed.
What are you talking about? > Thus, you can't support distributed session state with it. Well, you can’t put sessions in it because it doesn’t guarantee that things you put in it will stay in it (it’s a cache, not a persistence layer), but that has nothing to do with what you’re saying. > Having only one server is obviously bad from a scalability and > reliability point of view. Not sure, again, what you are talking about. In May this year Facebook reported that their memcached installation comprises about 200 16GB 4-core AMD64 servers: <http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/2007-May/004098.html> Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
