On Dec 17, 2007 4:03 PM, Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The chained thing is probably the single most useful thing in cat IMO > (if it's possible to even make such a dumb call ;) > > The way I have come to see it (it took a while, reading discussions > here helped me grasp this) is that the way you design your URI space > is very very fundamental to design of a web app. Chained helps you to > remember this and try to get it right at the start. It also makes the > decision about what actions go in what controllers separate from > decisions about URI namespace. (I haven't really figured out if that > is entirely a good thing or not, but it seems helpful.) > > The syntax *is* a bit hard to get used to at first - I find that the > important thing is to remember that Args() defines an endpoint (hope I > am remembering that right), other than that take a good look at what
Yeah - some time ago I proposed to add an EndPoint attribute and get rid of the CaptureArgs one that is not very intuitive (and use Args in both cases). -- Zbigniew Lukasiak http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
