Excellent, and thank you for your work.
As mentioned already I've used Log4perl on another project and I never
ran into the issue. I googled for "catalyst log4perl duplicate" and the
FAQ didn't turn up on the first page. Had I removed catalyst from the
search terms, it would have been item number two.
My apologies.
Regards,
Marius K.
Adam Jacob wrote:
> On 1/7/08, Marius Kjeldahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I tried briefly looking into the source, when I ran into this:
>>
>> # I really have no idea why the correct subroutine
>> # is on a different call stack
>> $caller{subroutine} = ( caller(1) )[3]; #wtf?
>>
>> Does anybody want to comment on the maturity of the Catalyst log4perl
>> module?
>
> Besides the smarty-pants comment, it's pretty mature. :)
>
> Adam
>
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
