"John Goulah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/16/2008 11:13:06 AM:
> > > > Why wouldn't you just use the standalone server bundled with > Catalyst? Fcgi is great for production, but the processes are > fairly thick memory wise, so having instances for each developer > could be an issue. We use the cat server for development and works > fine for about 5-10 people at any given time on a modest box (4G ram) Could be a massive assumption, but usually when you go through the cost (time, cap) of building out a dev server environment you want it to mirror your production servers as much as possible so that you spend time squishing bugs that may exist in your production environment -- not some other different environment. If they are using FCGI in prod it makes perfect sense to do so in dev. Why battle bugs that may be introduced on the standalone server, or worse miss bugs that _do_ affect your production environment because you are developing on a different environment? -Wade _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
