* Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-08 05:15]: > "roles" for providers?
I didn’t think of that. That sounds *very* cool. I wonder if this might possibly cause problems. One thing I’m not comfortable with, for a reason I can’t exactly pinpoint, is using the provider URI directly as a role. Maybe let the user configure a mapping from provider URIs to roles? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
