> > No, but how you provide an alternative to full RESTness for clients that > don't handle the full range of HTTP verbs -is- a matter for discussion. >
Which clients are we talking about here? I did a quick google search and could only find an off-hand remark along the lines of "in 2006 safari had poor support for REST verbs". I'm interested because in my own personal experience I haven't run into any problems generating PUT/POST/GET/DELETE with IE/FF/Opera browsers. Or are you talking about the inability to specify anything other than GET or POST as a form method? Patrick
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
