> Once we've got feedback in, everybody will go away and revise their > designs (or not, if they think you're all wrong :) and then we'll do > consultation on the final drafts.
I like this one best so far: http://catalyst.perl.org/ The submissions represent good work, and show potential. I prefer the original site because: - Best use of color - Use of fonts and layout keeps the eye from "getting lost" in the first second or so of viewing - Best navigation structure, especially over the leading contender http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat/, which I think will leave many people lost with the nav crammed into the upper corner where it might be easily overlooked for the bigger, more obvious content links below. Also, the nav is too small and vague, and could leave the initial visitor unsure what content the site offers /Mitch _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
