On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:16 PM, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
* On Thu, Jul 24 2008, Pedro Melo wrote:
And yes, the tradeoff is mod_perl, which is more complex than FCGI.
How does Perlbal require mod_perl? I would just run the application's
own HTTP server behind Perlbal. Not very complex at all.
It does not. If I implied otherwise it was not what I meant.
The assertion is that mod_perl is slightly more complex than FCGI for
some. I have no problem with that assertion, although I only use
mod_perl myself because I prefer to use HTTP all the way, and I find
apache2+mod_perl2 the most stable application environment for Perl.
You can perfectly use Perlbal with Apache|Lighttpd|Nginx+FastCGI.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP!
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
