On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:46 PM, J. Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * On Mon, Nov 03 2008, Jacinta Richardson wrote: >>> I know that Catalyst is about dispatch more than about CRUD, but I'd love >>> pointers to a tutorial about how to get a basic system with working CRUD up >>> and >>> working within minutes. >> >> I'm not sure that this will tell you anything valuable. What's good for >> quickly hacking something together in five minutes is rarely good for an >> application that needs to be maintained over many years. >> >> Regards, >> Jonathan Rockway >> > > The value is in "marketing". Showing what is possible in comparison > to other frameworks, which tend to show CRUD applications has value in > establishing convention.
It's not only marketing: establishing conventions is one, quick learning is another benefit. And if you subscribe to the Agile way of doing software - then you should also see the benefit of having a quick prototype. -- Zbigniew Lukasiak http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/ http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
