* Toby Corkindale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-27 01:55]: > The problem is the dependency Mouse (0.11) fails its unit tests > there.
That’s really the sole solid argument against a flamboyant use-the-CPAN attitude: you end up pulling in heaps of bloat because none of the stuff was written to form a coherent whole: every author uses their own favourite way of doing some common thing so you get four different OO frameworks of varying heft, two different YAML modules, every JSON module there is, etc., all loaded into the same perl process. What a waste. Case in point, Mouse is essentially Moose Light. Since Catalyst itself is becoming Moose-based, is there *any* reason to use Mouse instead? I suppose if it automatically stubs itself into a Moose loader where Moose is available, that would be not *too* bad, but it’s still a pointlessly added dependency. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
