2009/2/19 Byron Young <[email protected]>: > Jonathan Rockway wrote on 2009-02-19: >> * On Wed, Feb 18 2009, Dermot wrote: >>> Yes there is, at first glance, a lot of choice but is there. I would >>> say TT and Mason are the only realistic choices (for HTML). >> >> If by "realistic" you mean "unmaintainable for both designers and >> developers", then yes, you've described Mason and TT. >> >> The only qualities that Mason and TT have over other options is that >> they have been around for a while. > > Jonathan, > > Can I ask - what are the limitations with Mason (and TT) in your opinion? I > have been using it as the templating language for my Cat app (seemed better > than TT because I could exclude having to learn a new language for the > templates - I can just keep writing perl code).
TT is perl. It's not a different language. It's a bit of a learning curve. It provides familiar methods* like keys, splice, exists and substr. I <*_*> TT Dp. * http://template-toolkit.org/docs/manual/VMethods.html _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
