Interesting. I will give it some more thought. Thanks :)
Quoting kevin montuori <[email protected]>: > >>>>> "DD" == David Dorward <[email protected]> writes: > > DD> Limiting the side effects of laziness and bad practices with > other bad > DD> practices ... well, that's an interesting argument, I'll give > you that. > > that's funny. > > all other things being equal, since catalyst controllers can be > method > agnostic there's no reason to limit the application's functionality > by > only allowing POST or whatever. even in circumstances where the > HTML > should direct the browser to POST, accepting GET is often very > handy. > using openssl s_client to debug code behind SSL encrypted > connections, > for instance. (that's not to imply that it's not possible with > POST, > but it's less trivial. particularly at 3 am.) > > i think the maxim is: > > be strict in what you send and generous in what you receive. > > applications adhering to this philosophy tend to last. > > > k. > > > -- > kevin montuori > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > List: [email protected] > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
