Octavian Râşniţă wrote:
Does this mean that if I will compile Perl 5.10.0 from the tarball, it will give the same error?

Yes.

If yes, is Perl 5.10.1 available somewhere and stable enough for beeing recommended to install it?

<shrug> I wouldn't run bleed perl in production, but why not use that for development?

I'm not sure what your criteria for 'recommended to install it' are..

If no, do you have a better suggestion for solving this issue?

Either patch the tarball yourself, use the 5.10.1 git branch, or use a distribution which ships a reasonable perl (perl in debian lenny is patched for example), or use perl 5.8.

Cheers
t0m



_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to