On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tomas Doran <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 9 Jun 2009, at 19:19, J. Shirley wrote:
>
>> Being able to specify the session cookie name based on the request would
>> be useful for edge cases.
>>
>
> I totally agree.
>
> How would something like a 'cookie_name_stash_key' configuration parameter
> sit with you?
>
> If not provided, we do what we do now, if provided then that stash key will
> be used if present and defined, otherwise the default handling will be used.
>
>
If it can understand nested keys in the stash, I'm all in favor of it.
Something like $c->stash->{page}->{cookie_domain} would fit inline with what
I currently do for similar things.
-J
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
