[email protected] wrote:
Sorry, after reading it again after the many responses to this thread, I realised it's ok.
It's _NOT OK_, as you didn't get it first time. So it's obviously not clear *enough*.
Please supply the DBIC list with a doc patch to make it more clear and explicit.
Thanks t0m _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
