Yep. Sorry. I am working on a new one. Just keep getting stuck trying to update the tests to run correctly. I'll commit to getting a new one out this weekend even if I have to TODO the live tests for now.

The real issue here though is that using LWP::UA instead of ParanoidAgent is a security problem. Someone can point your openid form at a tarpit "provider." So I would definitely *not* use this in production without it but recent updates to LWP broke ParanoidAgent which relies on some deprecated debug behavior.

Brad Fitzpatrick and friends have done a great job getting these things together so I don't want to come off critical. The real answer here is to get ParanoidAgent fixed. If anyone can look at it and send a patch to that package, that would be the best thing. In the meanwhile I'll adjust the credential to at least be installable without failures.

-Ashley

On Jul 17, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:

Hi there,

It seems that http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=LWPx-ParanoidAgent +1.05
fails on every front (and if you check the history it wasn't much
better in previous releases).   So what you guys use as the LWP agent
for OpenID authentication?

--
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/ catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to