I see catalyst apps being complete CPAN packages as a real advantage. Taking away the make install option seems very limiting, and destructive for no good purpose at all. For instance, my previous employer uses this functionality to build debian packages of all of their apps.
With regards Marcus Ramberg On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Devin Austin<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi gang, > > There's been some discord as to whether or not Catalyst applications > should/should not have the option of make install. > > Personally, I'm not really partial either way. Especially with the advent > of tools like Dist::Zilla that allow you to keep track of the modules you > need and build a distribution to release. > > Either way, I think it's time we come to a consensus. Multiple times there > have been emails like this asking about it, so let's squash it once and for > all and get an answer. > > -dhoss > > -- > Devin Austin > http://www.codedright.net > http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?326568/hosting.html - Host with DreamHost! > > _______________________________________________ > List: [email protected] > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ > > _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
