On 5 Aug 2009, at 13:55, gutta wrote:
Robert Mah wrote:
Have you looked at memcached? Given that you have to share sessions
across
machines, it may suite your needs and will be lots faster than a db.
Thanks for your suggestion.
I have implemented session storage in db already.
I will update it with memcache as you are telling its more efficient
than db
storage.
So long as you don't make the mistake of thinking the memcache is the
session store, this is fine. Either a session to be retrieved exists
in memcache or it's retrieved from the DB and stuffed into memcache.
But that cache is exactly what it says - it's not a guaranteed or
persistent store.
/joel
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
