Tomas Doran wrote:
Toby Corkindale wrote:
It's interesting to note the headline figures have 5.71 performing 316
tps, vs 5.80 making only 283 tps.
The very important thing you haven't noted (unless I missed it) is what
perl version this benchmark was conducted under.
Some benchmarking was done before 5.8 was released, and it showed that
Catalyst 5.7 was (marginally) quicker on perl 5.8 and that Catalyst 5.8
was (marginally) quicker on perl 5.10 :)
So I'd be very interested to see the benchmark repeated with two
different perls, giving 4 results to compare and contrast.
Catalyst 5.80 on Perl 5.8.8, same VM hardware, same test app, testing
methodology, but against Debian 4.5 rather than Ubuntu 9.04.
Result: 191 tps.
(ie. Significantly slower than catalyst 5.80 on Perl 5.10, which was 282
tps)
-Toby
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
