Hello!
why shouldn't you use domain as the part of the language? like
en.example.com, cn.example.com and something like that?
Thanks.
Because each sub-domain would require another SSL key (or a special
group SSL key that can be used with more subdomains.
Moreover, I don't see that great advantage (not even in elegance) in using:
http://en-gb.mysite.com/resource/list
instead of:
http://mysite.com/en-gb/resource/list
If you're using the Chained dispatching, it's very straightforward to
map the secondo URL to a language.
Michele.
--
Michele Beltrame
http://www.italpro.net/ - [email protected]
Skype: arthas77 - Twitter: _arthas
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
