Hmm. Perhaps i misunderstand the concept. I was thinking there was the third option of using a psgi server or mod psgi -----Original Message----- Date: Friday, January 29, 2010 8:50:07 pm To: "catalyst" <[email protected]> From: "Hans Dieter Pearcey" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application
Excerpts from [email protected]'s message of Fri Jan 29 20:22:48 -0500 2010: > Enlightening how do you feel about fastcgi vs psgi? This question makes no sense. How do you feel about HTML vs. HTTP? PSGI is an interface for Perl code. FastCGI is an interface for network communications. They aren't in the same problem space, except to the degree that there are FastCGI servers that then run PSGI applications. hdp. _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
