DBIx::Class tends to pluralize relationships, so if you have a one to
many relationship with a table "company_person", it will name it
"company_people". Generally speaking this is also predictable :)
[email protected] wrote:
Hello catal[yi]sters,
I'm going to be crazzy about one generated accessor name:
__PACKAGE__->has_many(
"company_people", # I expected to be "company_persons"
"Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyPerson",
{ "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
);
Other names seems to be predictable:
__PACKAGE__->has_many(
"company_addresses",
"Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyAddress",
{ "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
);
I have no "people" pattern in my database. Did I miss something?
The schema has been generated as usual:
script/jf_create.pl model DB DBIC::Schema Jf::Schema create=static \
'dbi:Pg:dbname=jf' tomas
Thanx,
Tomas
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
--
Ben van Staveren
phone: +62 81 70777529
email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
