On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[email protected]>
wrote:

> * Wade Stuart <[email protected]> [2010-03-22 22:35]:
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>>> * Adam Sjøgren <[email protected]> [2010-03-16 18:15]:
>>>> An alternative could perhaps be CutyCapt:
>>>>
>>>> * http://cutycapt.sourceforge.net/
>>>
>>> It requires an X11 server, so it isn’t.
>>>
>> Xvfb has been the solution to this forever.
>
> And how is Xvfb (which is an X11 server) a solution the problem
> of requiring an X11 server?

It is a virtual frame buffer that allows x11 requiring apps to run
without a full display/head.  What besides that is your issue around
the  x11 requirement on servers?


>
> Regards,
> --
> Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: [email protected]
> Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to