it seems to me that you have companies that have lots.
something like this:
sub company :Chained('/auth') :CaptureArgs(1) { ... }
sub lot :Chained('company') :Args(0) { ... }
sub view_lot :Chained('lot') PathPart('') :Args(1) { ... }
would suffice, perhaps?
On 5/7/2010 1:12 PM, Evan Carroll wrote:
I have two destinations in my Catalyst app
/auth/company/5/lot
/auth/company/5/lot/5
This works and is often seen in Catalyst apps to achive this effect.
sub lot :Chained('/auth/company') :CaptureArgs(1) {
sub view_lot :Chained('/auth/company') :PathPart('') :Args(1) {
However, I would also expect the below to work; but, it seems it doesn't. I
can only formulate the effect I want the above way. This is
unfortunate because if all chained descendants of `lot` utilize a
check provided here in the chain, then shouldn't `view_lot` also get
to utilize that code? It would certainly be nice to eliminate
redundant code here.
sub lot :Chained('/auth/company') :CaptureArgs(1) {
sub view_lot :Chained('/auth/company/lot') :PathPart('') :Args(0) {
I think it is also confusing to those that first encounter it.
I always know that I could just call it /view, and be done with it, but still.
/auth/company/5/lot/5/view rather than, /auth/company/5/lot/5
But, I just wanted to know what others thought of this.
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
