Hey, Can you expand on this? I followed the suggestion that Ido and others had put forward, but I don't like the 'extra' midpoint to extend the chain; what would a simple example of your proposed solution look like?
Cheers, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Aristotle Pagaltzis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Catalyst] Re: A point of confusion/frustration on chained actions * Ido Perlmuter <[email protected]> [2010-05-20 00:35]: > In this case all you have to do is create the comment > action as a mid point, and then create another action with > a different name, but the same PathPart (e.g. comment) only > this time as an end-point, and all this action needs to do is > forward or detach to the original action (also passing any > parameters it needs). Don’t do that. Chain a `PathPart('')` endpoint from the mid-point. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
