Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010, 22:04:23 schrieb Stuart Watt: > Quick question: I'm currently using Catalyst::Plugin::I18N. Should I > be planning to move to CatalystX::I18N? Any thoughts...?
Stuart, I am in no way a Catalyst expert, just a mere beginner. And facing the same question :-) I played around with C::P::I18N, and it does perfectly what is says it does - l10n. But I want (need) more, like localized paths, for example. So I looked at C::P::I18N::Request which is perfect for that, but decides only on the browser header setting of accept-language, AFAICS. Which renders it useless for me. Then there is C::P::I18N::PathPrefix, which is a helpful and different approach. It comes in handy when path names are the same even for different languages, a situation which I have here in my current project. I haven't used CX::I18N yet, but looking at the docs it also looks promising. I will certainly give it a try and play around with it to see if it matches my needs. As always with Perl, there are several ways... which is good. Cheers, Ekki _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
