On 22 Mar 2011, at 10:33, John M. Dlugosz wrote:
If Catalyst had something called an "accessory" that could draw upon
the auto-discovery, loading, configuration, etc. of Components, but
did not claim to be "a model", I might agree.
Erm, why?
Why should it be called an 'accessory', rather than a 'model', what's
the difference other than the nomanclature you want to use?
Cheers
t0m
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
