Hi t0m -
> On 4 Aug 2011, at 16:57, Larry Leszczynski wrote:
>
> > Side question: Is namespace::autoclean needed any more?
>
> define 'needed'?
>
> It's never 'needed' as long as you never want a 'has' method, and
> you're happy with none of your imports being cleaned up, so all your
> classes are lolcat like in their ability to ->can('has');
>
> Cheers
> t0m
Thanks for the clarification - I had seen a fair amount of Moose code
that did *not* use namespace::autoclean, so wasn't sure if it was
something that had become automatically enabled or something. I see now
in the best practices document that it is still recommended:
http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Moose::Manual::BestPractices
Thanks!
Larry
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
