Am 10.10.2011 um 17:00 schrieb Tobias Kremer:
>> Your right ;-).
>
> And that's almost as bad as "would of been" ... ;-)
*tired
$son is consuming too much time during the nights ;-).
Back on topic:
Am 10.10.2011 um 14:56 schrieb Tobias Kremer:
> Yes, but does that really matter? If you're using Store::Memcached for
> example, one session would overwrite the other's data, thus you'll
> loose data anyways. There's no perfect solution to this problem, I
> guess :)
That depends. At least you'll lose(!) another request's data. But then you'd
lose the data of the second request, which may not be better. So... I thing
Store::DBI's way seems good.
Matthias
--
rainboxx Software Engineering
Matthias Dietrich
rainboxx Matthias Dietrich | Phone: +49 7141 / 2 39 14 71
Königsallee 43 | Fax : +49 3222 / 1 47 63 00
71638 Ludwigsburg | Mobil: +49 151 / 50 60 78 64
| WWW : http://www.rainboxx.de
CPAN: http://search.cpan.org/~mdietrich/
XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Matthias_Dietrich18
GULP: http://www.gulp.de/profil/rainboxx.html
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
