Using Catalyst::Plugin::Unicode::Encoding instead of "hacking" Catalyst.pm 
works, but it brakes some other parts of our code (form posted containing some 
accent are screwed up).

Reverting Catalyst.pm to old fashion bytes::length() is way simpler...

Anyone aware of drawback using it instead of length()?

Dominic Germain
---------------------------------------------
Administrateur réseau / Network administrator
Sogetel
www.sogetel.net

mailingli...@sogetel.com



Le 12-02-15 à 23:33, Bill Moseley a écrit :

> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Dominic Germain <mailingli...@sogetel.com> 
> wrote:
> No, we are not using Catalyst::Plugin::Unicode::Encoding
> 
> Does using it fix your problem?   It should.   But, you also should decode 
> input data, too.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm still not sure why that is a separate plugin.  When would you not need to 
> encode?  Although, seems like should also check for the utf8 flag -- to catch 
> the case where the content has already been encoded.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bill Moseley
> mose...@hank.org
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
> Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to