Spent a bit of time googlilng this and apparnelty I'm not searching very effectively today...
Short version: What's best-practices to get model library sub-modules hooked in to the main model? Long version: *catalyst.pl Thingy* *cd Thingy* *script/thingy_create.pl model DB DBIC::Schema \* * Thingy::Schema::DB create=static dbi:mysql:thingy \ * * dbuser dbpasswd* So now we have lib/Thingy/Model/DB like so: *package Thingy::Model::DB;* * * *use strict;* *use base 'Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema';* * * *__PACKAGE__->config(* * schema_class => 'Thingy::Schema::DB',* * * * connect_info => {* * dsn => 'dbi:mysql:thingy',* * user => 'dbuser',* * password => 'dbpasswd',* * }* *);* This is a top-level module. Instead of a monolithic mess with all possible library routines in one package, we want to modularize sub-functions into, say *Thingy::Model::DB::Team* *Thingy::Model::DB::User* *Thingy::Model::DB::Incident* etc Do we have those sub-modules "use" the top-level Thingy::Model::DB? Do we have Thingy::Model::DB use the sub-modules? Do we have the sub-modules "use base 'Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema'"? Or can they just "extends 'Catalyst::Model'" and if so how do they hook in with $c? Is there an elegant way to have all the sub-module models use the same DB config as the top model? ...or... What's the best practice for getting separate modules to work as models in the MVC universe? -- Will Trillich :: 812.454.6431 “Grading takes away all the fun from failing. And a huge part of education is about failure.” -- Shimon Schocken
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/