<http://www.enviroblog.org/2008/11/melamine-in-formula-here-we-go.htm>Melamine 
in formula: Another round with the FDA

By <http://enviroblog.org/bio.htm#Lisa%20Frack>Lisa Frack
November 26, 2008

When the FDA says "there's no reason for any parent to be concerned 
for any reason," I want to roll my eyes. So when FDA spokesperson 
Judy Leon said exactly that about its recent discovery of 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melamine>melamine in U.S. Baby formula, 
I did roll my eyes, albeit briefly.

Then I tried to get to the bottom of this, since I wasn't feeling 
overly confident that the FDA and manufacturers have got it covered. 
I'm sure I'm not alone in turning elsewhere for the full, 
science-based story. The Associated Press' 
<http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=AP&date=20081126&id=9408651>two
 
articles are quite thorough, and as always with breaking news, there 
are stories cropping up by the hour.

Turns out the Associated Press broke the story by requesting results 
of formula testing under a Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA). 
FDA hadn't even told manufacturers about their findings. There are 3 
firms involved in this mess (Nestle, Mead, and Abbott), and together 
they manufacture more than 90 percent of the formula made in the U.S. 
FDA originally gave the AP incorrect data, but 
<http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j7SAbhJj3By_isZUoRAgTOPHzwkQD94MB1S80>Wednesday's
 
story straightened it out.

Now we know that melamine was detected in Nestle's Good Start 
Supreme, cyanuric acid (a related chemical) was found in 3 samples of 
Mead Johnson's Enfamil Lipil with Iron, and Abbott (makers of 
Similac) told the AP their own tests had turned up some of the chemical.

What is melamine? It's a synthetic chemical with loads of familiar 
uses when combined with formaldehyde (dry erase boards, dishware, and 
formica, to name a few). When ingested at toxic levels, melamine can 
adversely affect kidney health and, as we saw with pets and babies in 
China, at high enough doses it can kill. Contaminants in formula pose 
an incredible risk to infants because of their small body size, 
intense appetites, immature body systems that can't metabolize toxic 
chemicals, and the fact that a single type of formula can be 100% of 
their diet.

If there is a silver lining to this situation (I know, I shouldn't 
mention linings since metal formula can linings still contain BPA, 
too...), it's that the amounts found are far lower than those found 
in China. But aside from that, I'm not feeling very grateful for an 
agency that has so very poorly protected public health in recent years.

At least 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/25/AR2008112502219.html>it's
 
common knowledge that the place needs an overhaul, and soon. 
Especially since it is contradicting its own prior statements on 
melamine by suggesting that the trace amounts being found are safe. 
Less than two months ago it made very clear where it stood on 
<http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/%7Edms/melamra3.html>melamine safety, and 
it doesn't add up:
FDA is currently unable to establish any level of melamine and 
melamine-related compounds in infant formula that does not raise 
public health concerns.

This change sure makes a parent wonder whether this lifting of the 
safety levels was due to increased understanding based on science and 
testing, or if it was conveniently raised because, well, they found 
some. Based on its abysmal, industry-preferring performance on 
bisphenol-A, my guess is the latter, but as with so very many toxins, 
we just don't know. And when it comes to feeding infants formula, not 
knowing just isn't good enough. So today 
<http://www.ewg.org/node/27390>we sent a letter to U.S. formula 
manufacturers, with this request:
Your clients have a right to know what your company is doing to 
identify and eliminate melamine in your infant formula, your strategy 
for preventing melamine contamination of your products, and how you 
are monitoring your products for all food additives and trace contaminants.

Please tell them what effective and aggressive measures you are 
taking to fulfill your commitment to every child who consumes your formula.

Agreed?

Christmas Postage from HolyPostage.com

<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the Kingdom!<*}}}><


<http://holypostage.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=37>
Christmas Postage from HolyPostage.com

<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the Kingdom!<*}}}><

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to