5046 S. Greenwood Ave., a special place.

<http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/5046-s-greenwood-ave-a-special-place>http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/5046-s-greenwood-ave-a-special-place

December 17, 2008 by 
<http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/author/texasdarlin/>texasdarlin

It must be a very special mansion, given the 
shenanigans that were pulled to make it the Obamas’ home.

Here, I’m just going to consolidate a few of the 
excellent comments ­ without further research or 
analysis ­ that were posted by readers in the 
Tuesday thread, 
<http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/fitzgerald-watch-5046-s-greenwood-ave/?preview=true&preview_id=5591&preview_nonce=29c96aba87>Fitzgerald
 
Watch: 5046 S. Greenwood Ave..  The comments 
provide additional information and raise valid 
questions about the transaction.

 From Jo Chgo:

I put the assessor’s parcel number into our 
friend Google, and this old blog post (April 
2008) from the Chicago Sun-Times pulled up. 
Hiding all in plain sight. What does it mean?

By Anna on April 26, 2008 4:42 PM

Dear Natasha and Chicago Sun Times Reporters,-

This link has some very curious information, some 
of which, I include below. If true this raises 
some questions for Sen. Obama (and some eyebrows) 
- Is this property linked to the bail of Tony Rezko?

<http://www.democrats.org/page/community/blog/mikestein>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/blog/mikestein

“Examine the Cook County land records:

“The deed for the house that the Obama’s 
purchased for $300k less than the asking price is 
from Frederic Wondisford and his wife, Sally 
Radovic, to the Obama’s Northern Trust Company 
Land Trust #10209 (established as such for 
“confidentiality”) is dated 15 June 2005 and is 
recorded 21 June 2005 as Document #0517233010.

Declared value is $1,650,000.00.

The deed for the vacant lot is from 
Wondisford/Radovic to Rita M. Rezko. This deed is 
dated 15 June 2005 and recorded a day earlier, on 
20 June 2005 as Document #0517133004.

Declared value is $625,000.00.

Examination of the Cook County records very 
clearly indicates that Rita M. Rezko conveyed the 
entire lot to Obama’s Northern Trust Company Land 
Trust #10209 on 11 January 2006 and recorded 16 
February 2006 as Document #0604733162.

Declared value is $104,500.00.

VERY IMPORTANTLY, thorough and careful 
examination of all Cook County land records fails 
to locate a deed back to Rita M. Rezko from the 
Obama’s Northern Trust Company Land Trust 
#10209.There is a “wild’ deed indicated from Rita 
M. Rezko to “5050 S. Greenwood LLC”. This is an 
Illinois limited liability corporation with the 
same address as Rezmar Corporation that is 
registered to the indicted Tony Rezko. (This deed 
is considered “wild” because it is not supported 
by any ownership deed from the Obama’s Land Trust.)

Furthermore, Tony Rezko’s registered corporation, 
5050 S. Greenwood LLC, then pledges the entire 
vacant lot in favor of a mortgage THAT IS STILL 
OPEN with Fifth Third Bank for the amount of $375,000.00.
This is Document #0703357023 recorded 2 February 2007.

THUS, THE ENTIRE VACANT LOT IS TITLED TO SEN. 
BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA (IN THEIR LAND TRUST 
FOR CONFIDENTIALITY) AND ALLOWED BY SENATOR 
BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA TO BE PLEDGED BY A TONY 
REZKO CORPORATION TO SECURE A LOAN.

This is contrary to what has been stated by 
Senator Obama; contrary to what has been stated 
by Senator Obama’s campaign staff, and contrary 
to what has been reported. It must be noted that 
a seemingly intelligent Harvard educated attorney 
does not make such unknowing errors as stated 
above. The above is obvious intent not “oversight”.

The home property description is 
20-11-115-034-0000 The (entire) lot description is 20-11-115-035-0000.

Originally, the entire piece of property was one 
description…so that the Obama’s could afford 
purchase, they pressed for the split. To do this, 
the county had to assign two property 
descriptions for each conveyance…and so that they 
could close on the same day as insisted by seller.

Thus, to answer your question, which can very 
easily be determined…to sell only a portion of 
the lot, there would have to be assigned two 
(new) property descriptions for the lot…but that 
was never done and, obviously, not desired or 
requested. Proof positive that Obama and Rezko 
are partners. Everything that he said was 
false…Note, too, that Obama’s campaign stated 
that Rita Rezko sold the lot to Michael Sreenam, 
one of her husband’s attorneys…as the fable goes, 
for a profit…to make the whole scenario plausible…”

Full post available at above noted link.

 From reps:

BHO & MO have never paid property tax for 5046 S. 
Greenwood. As well, the earnest money terms and 
down payment have Tony and Rita Resko’s 
fingerprints all over this deal. It stinks to high heaven!

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/obama-real-estate-facts-verify-verify-verify/

 From JBQ:

1. Was the lot division, lot split, or lot line 
adjustment required to be approved by a local 
governmental agency, such as the city? All lot 
divisions in many states have to be approved in 
advance, or the conveyance is illegal.

2 Does the remaining portion of the parcel have 
legal access and is the property buildable. If 
the remaining portion lacks independent legal 
access, or if the remaining portion is not 
legally buildable (i.e., too narrow), then it 
would have little to no value. If so, the 
entirety of the appraised value on the vacant lot 
should be allocated to the 10 strip. (The 10 
strip that was conveyed to Obama is no problem, 
since it becomes joined with the rest of his property.)

3. Was the intention of the parties to make the 
remaining portion unbuildable and mere open 
space? If so, Obama has appropriated the entire value of the vacant lot.

4. Is Obama interfering or frustrating the 
present owner from building on the remaining 
portion? Hopefully, the F.B.I. is investigating the above.

 From Insightanalytical:

Wasn’t Michelle on some sort of historical 
building board at the time they were 
“househunting?” And wasn’t the term limited to 
1…but, that rule was waived and she was in her 2nd term on that board???

 From seven:

Patti Blagojavich also got a lot of action from 
Mahajan, Obama’s banker. Don’t be surprised if 
the banker has notes on Gov. Blago’s property in 
addition to Obama and Rezko. The Bankers wife is 
going to jail if she isn’t already there.

 From reps:

 From Free Republic and Death by 1000 papercuts…

“While researching an article about Obama’s 
Chicago home– about the circumstances surrounding 
who is the “owner”, I happened across a bit of 
information: Obama’s home has a Fannie 
Mae-Freddie Mac mortgage to the tune of 
$1,320,000. (Page 5 of Cook County Property 
Assessment Record) The information comes from the 
Cook County Clerk’s office where the “owner” of 
the Obama home is listed as William Miceli, a 
former supervisor of Obama’s when he worked at the David Law Firm.

What’s unusual about the Obama mortgage is that 
the upper limits of a Fannie Mae loan on a single 
family dwelling as of January, 2008, is $417,000 
while mortgages in “high cost” areas cannot exceed $729,750.

The Obama’s mortage, through Northern Trust 
Company, is in the amount of $1,320,000. The 
limits for a Freddie Mac single family dwelling 
is $417,000, with an upper tier of $625,500 for 
homes located in Alaska, Hawaii, the Virgin 
Islands, and Guam. I looked into whether Cook 
County, Illinois, where the Obama home is 
located, and whether it is considered by Fannie 
Mae or Freddie Mac as a “high cost area”. I found 
this little snippet written by Lew Sichelman, of 
the Reality Times in 2004, a few months prior to 
the Obama’s purchasing their home: Is there any explanation for this?”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2148695/posts

 From Dr. Kate:

I believe Blagojevich’s wife was the Realtor for 
the transaction. Now we see why Rezko is talking 
more: Blago-Rezko-Rita Rezko-the bank-blago’s 
wife-obama-the FBI tapes-the house-the quid pro 
quo. 2005 no less. What was blago going to get 
for wife’s making the deal between rezko, rita r, 
and obama for their house? And Obama doesn’t own 
the house? So is he once again unscathed because 
someone else owns the house they call their own????

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to