10 things the food industry doesn't want you to know

<http://www.newsday.com/news/health/ny-health-topten1217,0,1589033.story>http://www.newsday.com/news/health/ny-health-topten1217,0,1589033.story
 
Premium Health News Service
3:25 PM EST, December 16, 2008
health tips


The big bucks for food companies are made from fast foods, snack 
foods and beverages. (Newsday Photo / Julia Gaines)

With America's obesity problem among kids reaching crisis 
proportions, even junk food makers have started to claim they want to 
steer children toward more healthful choices.

In a study released earlier this year, the U.S. Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention reported that about 32 percent of children 
were overweight but not obese, 16 percent were obese, and 11 percent 
were extremely obese. Food giant PepsiCo, for example, points out on 
its website that "we can play an important role in helping kids lead 
healthier lives by offering healthy product choices in schools."

The company highlights what it considers its healthier products 
within various food categories through a "Smart Spot" marketing 
campaign that features green symbols on packaging. PepsiCo's 
inclusive criteria award spots to foods of dubious nutritional value 
such as Diet Pepsi, Cap'n Crunch cereal, reduced-fat Doritos, and 
Cheetos, as well as to more nutritious products such as Quaker 
Oatmeal and Tropicana Orange Juice.

But are wellness initiatives like Smart Spot just marketing ploys? 
Such moves by the food industry may seem to be a step in the right 
direction, but ultimately makers of popular junk foods have an 
obligation to stockholders to encourage kids to eat more--not 
less--of the foods that fuel their profits, says David Ludwig, a 
pediatrician and co-author of a commentary published in October in 
the Journal of the American Medical Association that raises questions 
about whether big food companies can be trusted to help combat obesity.

Ludwig and article co-author Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition 
at New York University, both of whom have long histories of tracking 
the food industry, spoke with U.S. News and highlighted 10 things 
that junk food makers don't want you to know about their products and 
how they promote them:

1. Junk food makers spend billions advertising unhealthy foods to kids.

According to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), food makers 
spend some $1.6 billion annually to reach children through the 
traditional media as well the Internet, in-store advertising, and 
sweepstakes. An article published in 2006 in the Journal of Public 
Health Policy puts the number as high as $10 billion annually. 
Promotions often use cartoon characters or free giveaways to entice 
kids into the junk food fold. PepsiCo has pledged that it will 
advertise only "Smart Spot" products to children under 12.

2.The studies that food producers support tend to minimize health 
concerns associated with their products.

In fact, according to a review led by Ludwig of hundreds of studies 
that looked at the health effects of milk, juice, and soda, the 
likelihood of conclusions favorable to the industry was several times 
higher among industry-sponsored research than studies that received 
no industry funding. "If a study is funded by the industry, it may be 
closer to advertising than science," he says.

3. Junk food makers donate large sums of money to professional 
nutrition associations.

The American Dietetic Association, for example, accepts money from 
companies such as Coca-Cola, which get access to decision makers in 
the food and nutrition marketplace via ADA events and programs, as 
this release explains. As Nestle notes in her Blog and discusses at 
length in her book "Food Politics," the group even distributes 
nutritional fact sheets that are directly sponsored by specific 
industry groups.

The ADA's reasoning: "These collaborations take place with the 
understanding that ADA does not support any program or message that 
does not correspond with ADA's science-based healthful-eating 
messages and positions," according to the group's president, 
dietitian Martin Yadrick. "In fact, we think it's important for us to 
be at the same table with food companies because of the positive 
influence that we can have on them."

4. More processing means more profit, but typically makes the food 
less healthy.

Minimally processed foods such as fresh fruits and vegetables 
obviously aren't where food companies look for profits. The big bucks 
stem from turning government-subsidized commodity crops--mainly corn, 
wheat, and soybeans--into fast foods, snack foods, and beverages. 
High-profit products derived from these commodity crops are generally 
high in calories and low in nutritional value.

5. Less-processed foods are generally more satiating than their 
highly processed counterparts.

Fresh apples have an abundance of fiber and nutrients that are lost 
when they're processed into applesauce. And the added sugar or other 
sweeteners increase the number of calories without necessarily making 
the applesauce any more filling. Apple juice, which is even more 
processed, has had almost all of the fiber and nutrients stripped 
out. This same stripping out of nutrients, says Ludwig, happens with 
highly refined white bread compared with stone-ground whole wheat bread.

6. Many supposedly healthy replacement foods are hardly healthier 
than the foods they replace.

In 2006, for example, major beverage makers agreed to remove sugary 
sodas from school vending machines. But the industry mounted an 
intense lobbying effort that persuaded lawmakers to allow sports 
drinks and vitamin waters that--despite their slightly healthier 
reputations--still can be packed with sugar and calories.

7. A health claim on the label doesn't necessarily make a food healthy.

Health claims such as "zero trans fats" or "contains whole wheat" may 
create the false impression that a product is healthy when it's not. 
While the claims may be true, a product is not going to benefit your 
kid's health if it's also loaded with salt and sugar or saturated 
fat, say, and lacks fiber or other nutrients. "These claims are 
calorie distracters," adds Nestle. "They make people forget about the 
calories."

Dave DeCecco, a spokesperson for PepsiCo, counters that the intent of 
a labeling program such as Smart Spot is simply to help consumers 
pick a healthier choice within a category. "We're not trying to tell 
people that a bag of Doritos is healthier than asparagus. But, if 
you're buying chips, and you're busy, and you don't have a lot of 
time to read every part of the label, it's an easy way to make a 
smarter choice," he says.

8. Food industry pressure has made nutritional guidelines confusing.

As Nestle explained in "Food Politics," the food industry has a 
history of preferring scientific jargon to straight talk. As far back 
as 1977, public health officials attempted to include the advice 
"reduce consumption of meat" in an important report called Dietary 
Goals for the United States.

The report's authors capitulated to intense pushback from the cattle 
industry and used this less-direct and more ambiguous advice: "Choose 
meats, poultry, and fish which will reduce saturated fat intake." 
Overall, says Nestle, the government has a hard time suggesting that 
people eat less of anything.

9. The food industry funds front groups that fight anti-obesity 
public health initiatives.

Unless you follow politics closely, you wouldn't necessarily realize 
that a group with a name like the Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) 
has anything to do with the food industry. In fact, Ludwig and Nestle 
point out, this group lobbies aggressively against obesity-related 
public health campaigns--such as the one directed at removing junk 
food from schools--and is funded, according to the Center for Media 
and Democracy, primarily through donations from big food companies 
such as Coca-Cola, Cargill, Tyson Foods, and Wendy's.

10. The food industry works aggressively to discredit its critics.

According to the new JAMA article, the Center for Consumer Freedom 
boasts that "(our strategy) is to shoot the messenger. We've got to 
attack (activists') credibility as spokespersons."

The bottom line, says Nestle, is quite simple: Kids need to eat less, 
include more fruits and vegetables, and limit the junk food.

<*}}}>< <http://www.halfthekingdom.org/please%20donate.html>Donations 
are needed and very much appreciated <*}}}><
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

Lord, may everything we do begin with Your inspiration and continue 
with Your help,
so that all our prayers and works may begin in You and by You be happily ended.
We ask this through Christ our Lord.
Amen.



<*}}}>< <http://www.halfthekingdom.org/please%20donate.html>Donations 
are needed and very much appreciated <*}}}><
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

Lord, may everything we do begin with Your inspiration and continue 
with Your help,
so that all our prayers and works may begin in You and by You be happily ended.
We ask this through Christ our Lord.
Amen.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to