Friday Fax
  January 29, 2009 | Volume 12, Number 7
Dear Colleague,

We report today on UNICEF's new annual report 
which sadly once more promotes not child survival 
but women's rights. Moreover, they peddle what 
they oddly admit is the phony number of 500,000+ 
annual deaths due to pregnancy related issues. Poor UNICEF; poor us.

We also report on Barack Obama and his decision 
to begin funding abortions around the world.

Spread the word.

Yours sincerely,

Austin Ruse
President



UNICEF Report Ignores Child Survival, Focuses on 
Dangers of Childbearing to Women

By Susan Yoshihara

      (NEW YORK - C-FAM)  The UN children’s 
agency, UNICEF, launched its annual report this 
week claiming that, “Having a child remains one 
of the biggest health risks for women worldwide,” 
and dedicated the 168-page flagship publication 
to the issue of maternal mortality, virtually 
ignoring the agency’s mandate of child survival. 
The report recommends increased global financing 
of UN initiatives aimed at “family planning” and 
“reproductive health services” as the primary way 
to reduce maternal deaths, but also provides 
extensive evidence that there is no reliable data to substantiate its claims.

      Entitled, “The State of the World’s 
Children 2009: Maternal and Newborn Health,” the 
study addresses the problem of 536,000 maternal 
and 4.7 million newborn annual deaths worldwide 
focusing on Africa, Asia and Latin America.  Yet, 
the report undercuts at length the validity of 
its own statistics, stating that a “high degree 
of uncertainty for maternal mortality ratios 
indicates that all data points should be 
interpreted cautiously,” and saying “The [UN’s] 
2005 maternal mortality estimates are far from 
perfect,” merely reflecting “a strong commitment 
on the part of the international community to 
continually strive for greater accuracy and 
precision.” And while it argues that “more than 
99 per cent” of maternal deaths “occurred in 
developing countries,” it goes on to call 
“commonplace” the absence of data to make such a claim.

      In fact, the report admits that only 35 
percent of the data used to create the 536,000 
number in 2005 was based upon “complete/good” 
data. A full 35 percent of the 171 countries 
surveyed to create the number had “no data.” 
Another 20 percent of the total maternal 
mortality figure was from “estimates” and “uncertain/poor data.”

      Another contradiction in the report is its 
discussion of abortion. According to the report, 
abortion complications are the smallest 
contributor to maternal death in every one of the 
three developing regions studied. By contrast, 
hemorrhaging is the cause of nearly 30 percent of 
maternal deaths in all three regions, followed by 
hypertension and sepsis. Undefined “other causes” 
account for nearly a third of deaths in Africa 
and one fifth of the deaths in Asia and Latin America.

      Contradicting this evidence, the report 
calls for a “continuum of care” that promotes 
“reproductive health services,” a term used by 
some UN officials to include abortion. It then 
puts at the top of its eleven recommended 
interventions for reducing maternal deaths 
“promoting access to family planning services, 
based on individual country policies,” with 
skilled birth attendants and emergency obstetric 
care mentioned as lower priorities.

      The report also claims that in 2005, heads 
of state created “a specific target on 
reproductive health: Millennium Goal 5, Target 
B,” which seeks to “Achieve, by 2015, universal 
access to reproductive health” and includes 
“contraceptive prevalence rate,” and “unmet need 
for family planning,” as indicators of attaining 
the target. The UN Population Fund, 
contradictorily, claims that such a target was 
created in 2008.  In fact, the heads of state 
rejected the target in 2005, and have never voted on or adopted such a target.

      This is the second consecutive UNICEF 
annual report devoted to women’s rights rather 
than child survival. Experts attribute the 
organization’s transformation from a 
service-delivery organization to a 
rights-activist agency to its adopting a 
“rights-based approach” some two decades ago. The 
adoption of the approach was a bureaucratic 
decision that includes the active promotion of 
both the Women’s Convention (CEDAW) and the 
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).



Obama Clears Way for U.S. Funding of Abortion Overseas

By Samantha Singson

      (NEW YORK - C-FAM )  On his third day in 
office, U.S. president Barack Obama fulfilled his 
promise to abortion rights groups by issuing an 
executive rescinding the Mexico City Policy that 
protected American taxpayers from funding 
abortion overseas. Obama’s executive order makes 
international non-governmental organizations 
(NGOs) that promote and perform abortions in 
developing countries eligible for public funds.

      Considered by many to be one of the most 
effective pro-life policies of the Reagan and 
Bush administrations, the Mexico City policy 
required that NGOs pledge they would not “perform 
or promote abortion” in order to qualify for 
family planning funds from the U.S. Agency for 
International Development.  International Planned 
Parenthood Federation (IPPF), the largest 
abortion provider in the world, estimates that it 
has lost more than $100 million in funding because of the policy.

      Abortion rights groups targeted the Mexico 
City Policy, which they disparagingly call the 
“global gag rule,” even before President Obama 
officially took office. Just after the November 
election, a coalition of abortion advocacy groups 
submitted a secret 55-page memo to the 
President-elect outlining policy recommendations 
to advance "reproductive rights" in the first 100 
days of his new administration.  Striking down 
the Mexico City Policy was at the top of their wish list.

      Twenty two pro-life organizations issued a 
press release condemning Obama’s executive order 
as “nothing less than a bailout of the abortion 
industry, taking money away from grassroots 
organizations that truly help women and children 
in order to fund two radical abortion lobbyists 
in particular – International Planned Parenthood 
Federation and Marie Stopes International.”

      Pro-life leaders in the developing world 
also criticized the executive order.  Dr. Doreen 
Brady-West, an obstetrician gynecologist and 
chairwoman of Jamaica’s Coalition for the Defense 
of Life, told the Friday Fax that by choosing 
Obama, Americans have also “chosen a social 
policy that will take their nation toward the 
establishment of the post-modern (and 
anti-Christian) worldview as a cultural norm.” 
Dr. West concluded that President Obama's 
policies would “also strengthen the hands of 
those agencies that intend to export and enforce 
a culture of secular humanism in unwilling 
developing countries, with all the attendant 
implications for the family and for the most 
vulnerable human beings at the extremes of their natural life.”

      The abortion coalition is likely to see 
another item ticked off their wish list in the 
coming months. In a statement that accompanied 
the executive order to rescind the Mexico City 
Policy, President Obama stated that he will be 
“working with Congress to restore US financial 
support of the UN Population Fund (UNFPA).” Since 
2002, the US has withheld $244 million from UNFPA 
because of evidence that the organization is 
involved in and supportive of China’s draconian 
one-child policy that includes forced abortions and sterilizations.

      UNFPA executive director Thoraya Obaid 
boasted this week that the organization is 
“confident that under the new President's 
direction, the U.S. will resume its leadership in 
promoting and protecting women's reproductive health and rights worldwide.”

For more news, visit us at 
<http://www.c-fam.org/track/trackurl.asp?q=7AA5A4D9495E145F20054A16D9756CDDEA49FA9DA3AC063EE17D8D46BEA8E43F24F2301100C3F38B17AC3C53B708C7504FAE536063F2655D60F3A9AE805CC39E>www.c-fam.org.

Editor in Chief  –  Austin Ruse
Managing Editor  –  Piero Tozzi
Assistant Managing Editor  –  Hannah Russo
Chief Correspondent  –  Samantha Singson
Contributor  –  Susan Yoshihara

© Copyright 2008 Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required.
To subscribe to the Friday Fax send an e-mail to 
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]



<*}}}>< 
<http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic 
on Amazon <*}}}>< <*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

+ "The fruit of abortion is nuclear war" - Bl. Mother Teresa +

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to