Catholic Group Petitions Pope to Excommunicate Nancy Pelosi
<http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=43884>http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=43884
 


Friday, February 20, 2009
By Michael Chapman

[]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) (AP Photo)
(CNSNews.com) – Human Life International (HLI), a 
Catholic pro-life group based in Front Royal, 
Va., had a letter from its Rome office delivered 
to the Vatican this week, in which it called upon 
Pope Benedict XVI to “formally excommunicate” 
from the Catholic Church House Speaker Nancy 
Pelosi (D-Calif.). The pope met with Pelosi on Wednesday.

Experts in Canon Law, the rules that govern the 
Catholic Church, said this action is not 
unprecedented and noted that similar appeals for 
excommunication were made against Catholic judges 
who were enforcing racially discriminatory laws 
during the civil rights era. They also said that 
regular Catholics have a right to petition their 
pastors, bishops, and the pope in matters that 
pertain to the well-being of the church.

“The reason we called for the pope is because so 
many people have called on the bishops in the 
jurisdictions she lives in, who could possibly do 
it­and they won’t,” HLI President Rev. Thomas 
Euteneur told CNSNews.com. Pelosi has a home in 
the archdiocese of San Francisco, headed by 
Archbishop George Niederauer, and works in 
Washington, D.C., the archdiocese overseen by Archbishop Donald Wuerl.

Pelosi describes herself as “pro-choice,” and has 
voted for laws that promote abortion and 
artificial contraception, both of which are 
contrary to church teaching.  For example, she 
voted against banning partial-birth abortion, 
against the Hyde Amendment, which prohibited 
federal funding of abortion in most 
circumstances, and against the Mexico City 
policy, which denied U.S. tax dollars to 
organizations that perform or promote abortion 
abroad. She also voted against a complete ban on 
human cloning and in favor of using tax dollars 
for research that kills human embryos.

The church’s catechism states: “Human life must 
be respected and protected absolutely from the 
moment of conception…. Since the first century 
the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every 
procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.”

On Aug. 24, 2008, Pelosi was asked by Tom Brokaw 
on NBC’s “Meet the Press” about how she would 
advise then-Democratic presidential candidate 
Barack Obama if he asked her about when human 
life begins. She answered by claiming that the 
question of when life begins has been a 
long-running controversy within the Catholic Church.


[]

Pope Benedict XVI (AP Photo)
“I would say that as an ardent, practicing 
Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied 
for a long time,” said Pelosi.  “And what I know 
is, over the centuries, the doctors of the church 
have not been able to make that definition.  And 
Senator--St. Augustine said at three months.  We 
don't know. The point is, is that it shouldn’t 
have an impact on the woman’s right to 
choose.  Roe v. Wade talks about very clear 
definitions of when the child--first trimester, 
certain considerations; second trimester; not so 
third trimester.  There’s very clear 
distinctions.  This isn't about abortion on 
demand, it's about a careful, careful 
consideration of all factors and--to--that a 
woman has to make with her doctor and her 
god.  And so I don't think anybody can tell you 
when life begins, human life begins.  As I say, 
the Catholic Church for centuries has been 
discussing this, and there are those who've decided--”

Brokaw interrupted her at this point to point out 
that the “Catholic Church at the moment feels 
very strongly that it … begins at the point of conception.”

“I understand,” said Pelosi. “And this is like 
maybe 50 years or something like that.  So again, 
over the history of the church, this is an issue 
of controversy.  But it is, it is also true that 
God has given us, each of us, a free will and a 
responsibility to answer for our actions.  And we 
want abortions to be safe, rare, and reduce the 
number of abortions.  That's why we have this 
fight in Congress over contraception.  My 
Republican colleagues do not support 
contraception.  If you want to reduce the number 
of abortions, and we all do, we must -- it would 
behoove you to support family planning and, and 
contraception, you would think.  But that is not the case.”

After this broadcast, the U.S. Conference of 
Catholic Bishops released a statement on Aug. 26 
that said, “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi 
misrepresented the history and nature of the 
authentic teaching of the Catholic Church against 
abortion. In fact, the Catechism of the Catholic 
Church teaches, ‘Since the first century the 
Church has affirmed the moral evil of every 
procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.’”

Archbishop Wuerl also issued a 
<http://www.adw.org/news/news.asp?ID=569&Year=2008%20%20%20%20>statement, 
correcting Pelosi’s statements about Catholic 
teaching, as did Archbishop 
<http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/bishops/niederauer-pelosi.htm>Niederauer.
 


Pelosi did not retract her comments made on NBC. 
But her spokesman Brendan Daly issued a statement 
about Pelosi that partly reads: “She [Pelosi] was 
raised in a devout Catholic family who often 
disagreed with her pro-choice views.

“After she was elected to Congress, and the 
choice issue became more public as she would have 
to vote on it, she studied the matter more 
closely. Her views on when life begins were 
informed by the views of Saint Augustine, who 
said: ‘…the law does not provide that the act 
[abortion] pertains to homicide, for there cannot 
yet be said to be a live soul in a body that 
lacks sensation…’ (Saint Augustine, On Exodus 21.22)

“While Catholic teaching is clear that life 
begins at conception, many Catholics do not 
ascribe to that view. The Speaker agrees with the 
Church that we should reduce the number of 
abortions. She believes that can be done by 
making family planning more available, as well as 
by increasing the number of comprehensive 
age-appropriate sex education and caring adoption programs.”

Dr. Edward Peters, who holds the Edmund Cardinal 
Szoka Chair at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in 
Detroit, Mich., and is one of the most widely 
known canon lawyers in North America, said Nancy 
Pelosi is in violation of Canon 915 and likely 
other canon laws that would prohibit her from 
receiving communion at Mass and potentially face other penalties.

“I think Nancy Pelosi is in violation of Canon 
915 because of her advocacy of abortion and 
abortion-ism,” Peters told CNSNews.com. “Under 
Canon 915, she’s ineligible to receive the 
Eucharist, and if someone wants to contact her 
bishop, Niederauer, and express that opinion, 
they are perfectly within their rights to do 
so--and I also think they happen to be correct.”

Peter Vere, professor of Canon Law at Catholic 
Distance University and the author of “Surprised 
by Canon Law: 150 Questions Laypeople Ask About 
Canon Law,” said that Pelosi is in violation of 
Canon 915 and that her pastor should not allow her to receive communion.

On Aug. 25, The Hill newspaper quoted Pelosi as 
saying that she had not been denied communion. 
“[F]ortunately, for me, communion has not been 
withheld and I’m a regular communicant, so that 
would be a severe blow to me if that were the case,” said Pelosi.

Peters added that “Pelosi is also in danger under 
Canon 1369--those who use public shows and 
speeches to advocate against good morals. Nancy 
Pelosi does that all the time. But the penalty 
here is not excommunication. It’s a sort of 
generic, appropriate penalty, tailored to fit the circumstances.”

Peters, as well as Vere, however, said that HLI 
and Fr. Euteneur were certainly within the rights 
granted under Canon Law to petition the pope to excommunicate Pelosi.

It is not “unprecedented,” even though it is “not 
a common event,” Peters said of HLI’s actions. 
Church law “protects the rights of the faithful 
to raise questions about things that concern the 
good of the church,” he said. “A group is within 
their rights to present their arguments on the 
Nancy Pelosi issue.  I think their arguments are 
going to fail, but they are within their rights to ask for it.”

Maurice Healy, spokesman for the Archdiocese of 
San Francisco, confirmed to CNSNews.com that 
Archbishop Neiderauer met with Pelosi in private 
on Feb. 8. While details of that 
“pastoral-private” meeting cannot be disclosed, 
said Healy, he added that it would be correct, in 
this matter, to reference the bishop’s Sept. 5 
statement that publicly corrected Pelosi’s 
comments about the church’s position on abortion 
– a statement in which the archbishop also 
invited Pelosi to meet with him to discuss the issue.

Inquiries to Pelosi’s office on this story were 
not answered before this story went to 
press.  Questions to Maurice Healy about HLI’s 
appeal for Pelosi’s excommunication and the topic 
of prohibiting her from receiving communion were 
also not returned as this story went to press.

Fr. Euteneur told CNSNews.com that “when people 
call for excommunication it’s not because they’re 
just angry or have some political ax to grind 
against some political officials who call 
themselves Catholic. These are real serious 
concerns for the faith of millions of people, and 
a real cause to do so, according to church law, 
but we can’t do it ourselves because we’re not bishops.”

After Pelosi met with Pope Benedict in Rome on 
Wednesday, the Vatican released the following 
statement about the meeting: “His Holiness took 
the opportunity to speak of the requirements of 
the natural moral law and the Church’s consistent 
teaching on the dignity of human life from 
conception to natural death which enjoin all 
Catholics, and especially legislators, jurists 
and those responsible for the common good of 
society, to work in cooperation with all men and 
women of good will in creating a just system of 
laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development.”

Speaker Pelosi’s office also issued a statement 
on Feb. 18 about the meeting, which read: “It is 
with great joy that my husband, Paul, and I met 
with his Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI today. In 
our conversation, I had the opportunity to praise 
the Church’s leadership in fighting poverty, 
hunger and global warming, as well as the Holy 
Father’s dedication to religious freedom and his 
upcoming trip and message to Israel. I was proud 
to show his Holiness a photograph of my family’s 
papal visit in the 1950s, as well as a recent 
picture of our children and grandchildren.”

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to