"Bless those who curse you"

http://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/loving-our-enemies-how-is-this-possible.htm

Bless those who curse you





Loving Our Enemies


How is this possible?




Christ does not ask us to bless those who curse us, or to love our enemies.

In strikingly clear terms, he commands us to:

"Love your enemies, do good to them that hate you. Bless them that 
curse you, and pray for them that calumniate you"

(St. Luke 6.28)

This is not an option for a Christian, it is the Lord's expressed 
will and desire that we should do so. But how ...?

There are, of course, people that we do not feel drawn to --- people, 
in fact, whom we do not like at all, and some whom we even dislike 
intensely. It is, in fact, the case that there are people whom we 
utterly abhor (not hate ... which is something quite different, and 
which has, with no equivocation whatever, no place in the heart of a 
Christian). Some people simply are insufferable, intolerable. And yes 
... some people are even virtually consumed with evil ...  but Christ 
still bids us to love them!

"What", you ask, "is this madness? How can I love whom I do not even 
like, and may even abhor?"

That, really, is the question at hand. How is it possible for us to 
love not only those we do not like, but even those who curse us, 
vitriolically hate us and wish us ... and if they could, would do us 
... great evil?

How profoundly we misunderstand love ... Indeed, many never come to 
understand the true nature of love at all. How many marriages end in 
divorce because "the flame of love" has apparently been extinguished? 
How many "beautiful romances" have ended in disillusionment, ennui? 
When tragedy mars our beauty or encroaching age robs us of our youth, 
how often the "love" that had once accompanied it simply ceases.

This terrible misunderstanding takes a toll on us that few of us 
recognize. We have invested our entire concept of love in merely one 
aspect of love alone: what is immediate and sensory. Love is reduced 
to, and then totally invested in, our emotions. Period. If the 
"feeling" is gone, then the "love" has gone with it. If our senses, 
our emotional experiences, are no longer stimulated by the other, we 
speak of the love "withering". We can no longer "feel" it. It no 
longer "excites" us. We then reason that the love has ceased.  And in 
a sense, it has. It has ceased to be sensuous. One facet of that 
multifaceted gem has been occluded.

The problem, however, is that it is precisely this facet of the 
jewel, and this facet alone, into which we have peered, and the 
surface light that dazzled us --- and in which we found our own 
reflection --- is no longer refracted off the stone. We have looked 
at the stone ... but not into it! We have seen, as it were been 
blinded by, fixated upon, the surface light ... without ever pressing 
the lens of our own love to the other facets that reveal another and 
entirely different world within, a world of extraordinary complexity 
and breath-taking beauty! It is, in short, the difference between 
holding a diamond at arm's length and admiring its beauty... and 
placing ones eye to the diamond, where in crystalline light we stand 
in awe of the deep beauty within that surpasses in every measure the 
superficial beauty we see from afar. It is the difference between 
peering at the beauty of another--- and peering into the beauty of another.

To carry this analogy a bit further, we may say that the bringing of 
the diamond to the eye is an act of the will ... not an instinctive 
response to some emotion. We approach it with purpose, rather than 
colliding with it serendipitously. It is a conscious attempt to 
penetrate, rather than to reflect upon, the deep mystery sequestered 
within it; to go beyond the appearances, however magnificent, to 
deeper and vastly more expansive realities ... realities that 
ultimately touch upon the very image of God.

This is the most apposite metaphor for the true nature of love.




What is Love ... after all?

To begin with, it is crucial to understand that love is not simply a 
feeling ... but is preeminently an act of the will.

In essence, to love is to have the other person's total welfare at 
heart: it is to will them good in all things, and evil in none.

Pause for a moment and think of someone you genuinely love.

There is affection in that love, yes? But how does your love for that 
person express itself, manifest itself, apart from the affection that 
is uniquely experienced toward that individual? When we think upon 
it, we soon find that affective expressions of love, expressions 
simply involving our emotions, are only one part of our expression of 
our love for them. If our love is our affection only ... if it is 
solely a matter of feelings and emotions ... then we can be said to 
love another even as we mistreat them, abuse them, curse them, and 
wish every manner of evil upon them. We can be rude, discourteous, 
selfish, inconsiderate, manipulative and even physically violent 
toward them --- and at the same time, because we feel an emotion 
within us that is inexplicably contrary to virtually everything we 
say or do to that person --- can we still be understood to love them? 
Not only is there no correspondence between this emotion and our 
expressions of it, but complete contradiction! If such exists --- and 
sadly, I believe that behavior of this sort, still construing itself 
as love, does exist --- it can only be understood in terms of a 
pathology. It is not what we understand when we entertain the notion of love.

The point is that Christ does not command us to have an emotion or a 
feeling toward a person. He cannot. Love of this sort cannot be 
commanded. It is simply the case, and for too many reasons to 
enumerate, that we dislike some individuals and \ find others 
intolerable. If we look at the matter carefully, we find that while 
we can constrain our emotions, we cannot compel them. We can 
constrain our anger, but we cannot spontaneously invoke it. We can no 
sooner be commanded to anger than to affective love. However, 
everything else apart from what is affective, that is to say, apart 
from what pertains to feelings or emotions, can in fact be commanded 
... and is ... by Christ Himself!

Once we remove the affective element of love that is an emotional 
bond unique between two individuals, everything else that pertains to 
loving another person is, in fact, subject to our will. We can will 
to do good to others, even while we cannot will to experience 
affection for them. It is within our power to say and to do 
everything which the expression of genuine love entails --- 
everything by which we coherently understand one person as loving 
another --- even if we do not have an emotional investment in that person!

Yes, we can love those who vex us terribly and who would even bring 
us to injury. Yes, we can love whom we dislike! The love of which 
Christ speaks, the love He commands, has nothing whatever to do with 
sensory gratification or emotional fulfillment. This unique affective 
dimension of love spontaneously arises between two people in addition 
to their obligation to love one another in ways that are not 
affective --- which is to say, in all the ways not pertaining to, or 
expressive of, emotional attachment.

Understood in these terms, it is not the case of one love being 
superior to another. It is that affective love possess a spontaneous 
dimension beyond the same obligations of love incumbent upon all of 
us. It fulfills the precepts within this one individual --- and then 
exceeds them in the way of superabundance through an emotional 
investment that spontaneously emerges between two individuals in a 
way that does not characterize, but also does not diminish, their 
love for all others.

Once we understand this, we realize that we are not called, still 
less compelled, to intimacy with others at large.

Much of the touching and feeling that occurs with disturbing 
frequency at Mass is very likely the result of a confusion between 
love and intimacy. We tend to equate the one with the other, and 
when, with good reason, we feel uncomfortable with the intimate 
gestures of others with whom we are not on intimate terms, more often 
than not we wrongly reproach ourselves, rather than this mistaken 
conflation of love and intimacy being forced upon us. It is 
essentially the difference between love as charity and love as 
intimacy. God does not command us to be intimate with our neighbors. No?

To bless others, genuinely asking God --- ex corde -- to bestow on 
them favor, mercy, and goodness, is an act of reciprocal beneficence, 
for in blessing our enemies: those who hate us, do us harm, and wish 
us evil, we bring upon ourselves an unspeakable blessing also:
"Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them 
that persecute and calumniate you: That you may be the children of 
your Father Who is in Heaven."

St. Matthew 5.44

Bless friend and enemy alike; it is no more than our duty. For the 
very One Who commanded us to love our enemies bids us in so doing to 
know ourselves --- which to know, is to arrive at humility:

"When you shall have done all these things that are commanded you, 
say: We are unprofitable servants; we have done that which we ought 
to do."

St. Luke 17.10


                   A Poor Clare Colettine Nun

<http://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/bless-those-who-curse-you.pdf>
[]
    
<http://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/bless-those-who-curse-you.pdf>Printable 
PDF Version

<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Custom Faith-based U.S. Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/theblog/join-the-network/>The 
Network Directory <*}}}><
<*}}}>< <http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic on Amazon 
<*}}}>< <*}}}>< 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/on+allposters+today.html>on AllPosters 
today <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

+ "The fruit of abortion is nuclear war" - Bl. Mother Teresa +


<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Custom Faith-based U.S. Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/theblog/join-the-network/>The 
Network Directory <*}}}><
<*}}}>< <http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic on Amazon 
<*}}}>< <*}}}>< 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/on+allposters+today.html>on AllPosters 
today <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

+ "The fruit of abortion is nuclear war" - Bl. Mother Teresa +

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to